Whenever I look at my web stats, I'm overwhelmed and shockingly surprised, how many people find its way to my site using the very informative keywords i hate blade servers. To use such keywords in a search engine means it must have caused a lot (hell a lot) of frustration.
Now the question is: Which blade vendor actually causes most trouble? Unfortunately I can't compare this in personal working experience but good old friend Google helps us a bit. If one searches for sun blade problem Google reveals that there are approximately 512'000 results. Let's do this on four big blade server vendors and this is the result:
| keyword |
sun | dell | hp | ibm |
| blade problem | 512000 | 1060000 | 2110000 | 775000 |
| blade error | 152000 | 565000 | 1080000 | 413000 |
I know this actually doesn't represent real error statistics and doesn't prove which blade system is better or more stable, but it is funny anyhow to see the enormous differences in the amount of web pages concerning blade problems.
No comments yet.
AWS Android Ansible Apache Apple Atlassian BSD Backup Bash Bluecoat CMS Chef Cloud Coding Consul Containers CouchDB DB DNS Database Databases Docker ELK Elasticsearch Filebeat FreeBSD Galera Git GlusterFS Grafana Graphics HAProxy HTML Hacks Hardware Icinga Icingaweb Icingaweb2 Influx Internet Java KVM Kibana Kodi Kubernetes LVM LXC Linux Logstash Mac Macintosh Mail MariaDB Minio MongoDB Monitoring Multimedia MySQL NFS Nagios Network Nginx OSSEC OTRS Office PGSQL PHP Perl Personal PostgreSQL Postgres PowerDNS Proxmox Proxy Python Rancher Rant Redis Roundcube SSL Samba Seafile Security Shell SmartOS Solaris Surveillance Systemd TLS Tomcat Ubuntu Unix VMWare VMware Varnish Virtualization Windows Wireless Wordpress Wyse ZFS Zoneminder